When “Safe Country” Is Not Safe
This is the story of Amina (*a fictional name). She is a 32-year-old woman from Morocco. Amina is a survivor of gender-based violence and human trafficking. Before leaving her country, she lived with her extended family in a conservative rural area and worked informally as a hairdresser. In her home country, she survived sexual assault, and when she tried to address the assault, instead of support, she faced harassment, threats, and physical abuse from members of her family, among others.
Given the absence of state protection, the risk of continued gender-based violence, and the strong social stigma, Amina was forced to flee Morocco in search of safety. She arrived in Turkiye, where she was unable to access safety and protection. During this period, Amina was exposed to additional gender-based violence and was forced to move onward.
Amina arrived in Greece after a dangerous journey across the Mediterranean. Upon arrival, she was registered by the Greek authorities, who informed her that Morocco is officially considered a “safe country of origin,” meaning her asylum application would be examined under an accelerated procedure with a high likelihood of rejection.
At this critical stage, Amina approached ELIL.
ELIL’s legal team conducted a detailed individual assessment of Amina’s case and had several sessions with her for the proper preparation of her case before the responsible authorities. They provided her with clear information about the asylum process, identified key elements showing that Morocco is not safe for her, and ensured that her vulnerabilities were fully taken into account.
The legal team also ensured that Amina felt prepared for her asylum interview, supporting her throughout the long and complex procedure.
Her lawyer represented her during the interview, ensured her referral to the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) for victims of trafficking, and addressed all relevant aspects of her case. Supporting evidence was collected, including information on Morocco and reports on women’s rights, and a detailed legal memorandum was submitted to support Amina’s individual circumstances.
Despite Morocco’s classification as a safe country of origin, the Greek Asylum Service recognised that the presumption of safety is not absolute and must be assessed on an individual basis.
In its decision, the Asylum Service acknowledged that Amina faced a well-founded fear of persecution due to her gender and personal circumstances, and that Morocco was unable or unwilling to provide effective protection. As a result, Amina was granted international protection.
Today, Amina is a recognised refugee in Greece. She has legal residence, access to healthcare, and the right to work.
Most importantly, Amina is safe.
Amina’s case demonstrates that “safe country of origin” does not mean “safe for everyone.” Individual assessment, quality legal support, and a gender-sensitive approach are essential to ensuring access to protection for all.
*Personal details have been changed to protect the anonymity of the applicant.